USPTO serial 79233182
FLUID INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLUID INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Monitoring instruments, sensors and detectors for measuring the level and quality of oil; computer software for remote monitoring, management and tracking of oil condition; programs and software for smart phones and mobile devices for remote monitoring, management and tracking of oil condition; computer software for analysis and reporting of research data; programs and software for smart phones and mobile devices for analysis and reporting of research data | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Flushing, repair, maintenance and cleaning of oil systems; oil well fracturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Reprocessing lubrication oils; refining of oil; refining services; processing of waste oil; oil-spill treatment; filtration services for the para-petroleum industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Condition monitoring relating to oils; oil analysis; analysis for oil research; analysis and testing for the oil industry; oil research; analysis and testing services in the field of oil exploitation; biotechnological research relating to the petroleum industry; analysis of oil reservoirs; provision of technological consultancy in the field of oil refining industry; preparation of reports relating to oil condition and quality; preparation of engineering reports; preparation of reports relating to oil use; preparation of oil analysis reports; testing to detect contaminants in oil; analysis of minerals and oils; conducting magnetic resonance imaging interpretation and analysis for the petroleum industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |