USPTO serial 79233240
GROUNDED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROUNDED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivia M. Clavio
Olivia M. Clavio Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian St.Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; coffee extracts; beverages with a base of coffee; coffee flavourings namely, coffee flavored syrup used in making food beverages; coffee substitutes; decaffeinated coffee; decaffeinated tea; coffee products, namely, coffee essences; flavoured coffee; coffee beans; beverages made with a base of espresso, namely, espresso drinks; ice beverages with a coffee, cocoa, tea or chocolate base; tea; tea extracts; herbal tea other than for medicinal use; beverages made with a base of tea; ready to drink tea; ready to drink coffee; flavoured tea; cocoa; beverages made with a base of cocoa or chocolate; hot chocolate; chocolate and chocolate products, namely, chocolate coated nuts, chocolate coated raisins, chocolate fudge, chocolate truffles and chocolate coated coffee beans; flavouring syrups for making coffee, tea and herbal tea-based beverages, namely, syrup for flavouring food or beverages; tisanes made of tea; fruit sauces; ice cream; ice; frozen confectionery; candy and confectionary made of sugar; sugar; honey; treacle; mustard; vinegar based sauces in the nature of condiments; spices and seasonings namely salt and pepper | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely carbonated beverages; water, namely mineral and sparkling water; soft drinks; fruit beverages; juices; fruit juices; fruit juice concentrates; fruit juice extracts used in the preparation of beverages; syrups, and other preparations for making beverages, namely, syrups used in the preparation of soft drinks; aerated non-alcoholic drinks, namely, aerated mineral waters and aerated fruit juices; smoothies; vegetable juices; vegetable juice concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks; non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with tea, chocolate, cocoa or coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink; coffee shop, café and restaurant services; cafeteria and restaurant services; catering services; office catering services for the provision of coffee, namely, office coffee supply services; food preparation; serving food and drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |