USPTO serial 79233354
COPPERFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERLIN, JUSTIN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COPPERFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; beer-based beverages; low-alcohol beer; alcohol-free beers; ginger beer; craft beers; flavoured beers; wheat beer; non-alcoholic drinks; cordials [non-alcoholic]; non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic malt drinks; non-alcoholic malt beverages; non-alcoholic beer; non-alcoholic fruit punch; alcohol free cider | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wines; sparkling wines; gin; vermouth; vodka; whiskey; bourbon whiskey; alcoholic carbonated beverages, except beer; alcoholic beverages [except beers]; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages; rum [alcoholic beverage]; cordials [alcoholic beverages]; low-alcoholic wine; low alcoholic drinks; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic cordials; alcoholic bitters; alcoholic cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |