USPTO serial 79234317
BITRONVIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEAUDRY-TORRES, FAITH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BITRONVIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Intercoms; intercommunication apparatus; video screens; video telephones; video recorders; video receivers; wireless transmitters; video circuit boards; video monitors; liquid crystal display monitors; digital video recorders; computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; video cameras; digital video cameras; interface circuits for video cameras; video playback apparatus; audio- and video-receivers; wireless receivers; wireless transmission units; video surveillance systems; video surveillance cameras; electric and electronic video surveillance installations; closed circuit television cameras; anti-theft warning apparatus; burglar alarms; electronic burglar alarms; theft prevention installations, electric; anti-intrusion alarms; sirens; motion sensors; smoke alarms; gas sensors; temperature sensors; infrared detectors; hygrometers; remote controls; application software; electronic telephone dialers; keypads for security alarms; electrical and electronic control apparatus for use with apparatus or installations for heating; video intercom handsets; video intercom monitors; intercom push-button panels; video intercom push-button panels; software for intercom systems and video intercom systems; software for anti-intrusion systems; video transmitters; door opening detectors and window opening detectors for anti-intrusion systems; electronic control units for anti-intrusion systems; remote controls for anti-intrusion systems; electronic current plugs, being smart plugs, for controlling lamps and home appliances and for monitoring the electrical consumption; electronic relay switches for controlling lighting devices and window blinds; devices for managing and controlling the electric loads in the home; all the above-mentioned goods not related to vehicles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |