USPTO serial 79234411
FABRIC AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FABRIC AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Trade Mark Consultants Co.54 Hillbury AvenueHarrow, Middlesex HA3 8EW,UNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for use in data processing; computer hardware and computer software relating to human resources management and consultation and for quality control management; all of the above not related to fabric industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functions; online and offline retail store and wholesale store services in connection with computer software relating to human resources and quality control management; all of the above not related to fabric industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer technology consultancy; rental of scientific apparatus and instruments, computer installations, apparatus and instruments, apparatus and instruments for use with computers, namely, computer peripherals, printers not 3D, scanners, monitors, speakers, keyboards and mice, computer firmware, computer hardware,computer software, parts and fittings for all the aforesaid; computer systems analysis, research, design, development and programming; maintenance of computer software for computer systems; rental of web servers; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware and computer software consultancy; computer software technology support, namely, help desk services; hosting of web sites for others; creating and maintaining web sites; design, development and leasing of computer software and hardware; programming, updating and upgrading of computer software; configuration of computer networks; information, advisory and consultancy services all relating to the aforementioned services; installation, repair and maintenance of computer software; all of the above not related to fabric industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |