Drawing for ARCUT

USPTO serial 79234588

ARCUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5699933Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2019
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ARCUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Smith

Michael T. Smith Birch, Stewart, Kolasch, & Birch LLP2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 600Vienna, VA 22180United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Milling tools for machines, particularly solid milling tools in the nature of milling cuttersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 26, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance