Drawing for VOLTA MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SERVING HEART RHYTHM

USPTO serial 79235049

VOLTA MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SERVING HEART RHYTHM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VOLTA MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SERVING HEART RHYTHM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use with cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; data processing apparatus for use with cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; robots with artificial intelligence for use for interventional cardiologyACTIVE—
010Testing apparatus for medical use with cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; diagnostic apparatus for medical use with cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; surgical apparatus and instruments; electrocardiographs; electrodes for medical use; heart pacemakers; veterinary apparatus and instruments for medical use with cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiologyACTIVE—
038Provision of access to databasesACTIVE—
042Computer system analysis for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; computer system design for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; software development for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; software as a service [saas] for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; rental of computer software for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiology; scientific research related to for cardiac diagnostics and interventional cardiology and electrophysiologyACTIVE—
044Health care services; medical assistance; veterinary assistance; health counseling services; medical equipment rental; hospital services; telemedicine servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 7, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 28, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance