USPTO serial 79235067
KIMYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5759895Status 708Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2019
- Examiner
- KEATING, SHANNON B
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KIMYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Differdange, LU
FR
F-44100 NANTES, FR
F-44100 NANTES, FR
F-44100 NANTES, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
Scott J. Major Millen White Zelano & Branigan, PC2200 Clarendon Blvd., 14th FloorArlington, VA 22201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Software for monitoring the consumption of ink cartridges and filament reels and resin and powder receptacles for 3D printers, automatic order and delivery of new cartridges, reels and receptacles and collection of used cartridges, reels and receptacles and filament offcuts and objects coming from used 3D printers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Extruded plastic in the form of semi-finished filaments for use with 3D printers; semi-processed artificial resins in the form of filaments, liquids and powders for use with 3D printers; semi-worked plastic filaments equipped with natural fibers intended for use with 3D printers; [ recycled plastic granules from used ink cartridges and toner for printers and photocopiers for use in further manufacture; ] recycled plastic granules from plastic materials and end of life plastic products for use in further manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering consulting services; engineering services in the field of designing project studies related to 3D printing; engineering project management services; technical consultation for project development in the field of engineering; all these services exclusively relating to 3D printing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Airtech Europe S.à.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by KIMYA
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KIMYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |