Drawing for CONNEXX

USPTO serial 79235342

CONNEXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5940511Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 24, 2019
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNEXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Megan E. Spitz

Megan E. Spitz Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009analog/digital converters; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; electrical connecting parts; electric relays; apparatus for commutation of electric signals; apparatus for transferring electric signals; weighing apparatus and instruments; all aforementioned goods not being for use with video or audio signals and only for use in connection with weighing equipment or with measuring instruments for industrial use which are not destined for use for video or audio signals or for use within vehicles or destined for use as vehicle parts and which are only destined for weighing or weighing services and which are not especially concepted for services related to vehicles and vehicle partsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 24, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 22, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2019ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 6, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2018CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 26, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance