USPTO serial 79235355
MAYVINCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAYVINCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Glass coatings, paints, and colorants in the nature of tint laminations; vehicle corrosion inhibiting preparations in the nature of a coating; coating preparations having water repellent properties (paint); rust inhibiting preparations in the nature of a coating for use on vehicles; protective coatings, namely, anti-tarnishing preparations for surfaces including windows | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Handelsmaatschappij Ayanmo B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Handelsmaatschappij Ayanmo Europe B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Handelsmaatschappij Ayanmo Europe B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named MAYVINCI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |