USPTO serial 79235361
BREAKTIME VR COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BREAKTIME VR COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; computer software platforms; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; virtual reality hardware; virtual reality game software; virtual reality software | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Virtual reality game services provided on-line from a computer network; art gallery services (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); audio, video and multimedia production, and photography; electronic games services, including provision of computer games on-line or by means of a global computer network; interactive entertainment services; provision of cinema or theatre facilities; provision of on-line entertainment; entertainment services; multimedia entertainment software publishing services; on-line gambling services; publication of computer games; provision of on-line computer games; gaming services for entertainment purposes; providing on-line interactive computer games; provision of games by means of a computer based system; game services provided on-line from a computer network; electronic games services provided by means of a global communication network; electronic games services provided via a global computer network; games services provided via computer networks and global communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer game software and virtual reality software; it services (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau -rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); design and development of virtual reality software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |