USPTO serial 79235382
ASTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Ceramic tiles; natural stone tiles; glazed ceramic tiles; ceramic tiles for flooring and lining; ceramic tiles for facing; tiles, not of metal, for building; wall tiles, not of metal; tile floorings, not of metal; floor panels, not of metal; wall boards, not of metal; building panels, not of metal; cladding, not of metal, for building; linings, not of metal, for building; wall claddings, not of metal, for building; wall linings, not of metal, for building; floor tiles, not of metal; floors, not of metal; mosaics for building; building glass; glass tiles, not for roofing; stone; artificial stone; building stone; porphyry, being stone; marble; granite; parquet flooring | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale services on behalf of third parties, also on-line, of ceramic tiles, natural stone tiles, glazed ceramic tiles, ceramic tiles for flooring and lining, ceramic tiles for facing, non-metal tiles for building, non-metal wall tiles, non-metal tile floorings; retail and wholesale services on behalf of third parties, also on-line, of non-metal floor panels, non-metal wall boards, non-metal building panels, non-metal claddings for building, non-metal linings for building, non-metal wall claddings for building, non-metal wall linings for building; retail and wholesale services on behalf of third parties, also on-line, of non-metal floor tiles, non-metal floors, mosaics for building, building glass, glass tiles not for roofing, stone, artificial stone, building stone, porphyry, marble, granite, parquet flooring, non-metallic building materials; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; commercial information and advice for consumers, being consumer advice shop; sales promotion for others; outsourcing services, being business assistance; procurement services for others, being purchasing goods and services for other businesses; demonstration of goods; shop window dressing; sponsorship search; business inquiries; business information; computerized on-line retail store services; promoting the goods and services of others on the Internet; advertising services; business management; business administration services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |