USPTO serial 79235514
ROUTE 66
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROUTE 66?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Govinda M. Davis
Govinda M. Davis DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice; tapioca; sago; flour; processed cereals; processed grains, processed cereals for food for human consumption; noodles; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar, gum paste, yogurt-covered nuts, confectionery made of sugar substitutes; sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; vinegar; spices; cereal-based snack food; rice-based pudding dessert; cookies; bagels; doughnuts; candy; chewing gum; caramels; lollipops; popcorn; chocolate; tacos; tortillas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |