USPTO serial 79236261
WOODPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5694135Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 2019
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOODPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Stohry
Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry LLP212 W. 10th St., Suite A-285Indianapolis, IN 46202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic cutting machines; carbide tools for metal cutting machines; cutting machines; machines for manufacturing furniture; laser applied machining devices, namely, laser engraving machines; apparatus for use in cutting, namely, cutting torches; automatic machines for cutting work pieces; circle cutting tools for use with hand-operated tools, namely, power drill bits; circle cutting tools for use with machines; cutting blades being parts of machines; cutting inserts, namely, blades being parts of machines; cutting tools being parts of machines; cutting tools being power-operated, namely, power-driven saws; cutting blades for use in powered hand-held tools; machine tools for cutting; machines for cutting; tool bits for cutting being parts of machines; work processing machines for the cutting of metals; size reduction machines for wood; machines for shaping metal; laser processing machines, namely, laser engraving machines for woodworking; laser welding apparatus; machine tools for working metals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |