USPTO serial 79237088
API PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EBAUGH, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with API PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; recorded content; media content; electronic publications, downloadable; software; programs for computers; downloadable computer software; computer software for business purposes; industrial controls incorporating software; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; software for searching and retrieving information across a computer network; computer search engine software; computer software for application and database integration; computer software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software; software development, programming and implementation; computer programming; computer software programming services; creation of control programs for automated measurement, assembly, adjustment, and related visualisation; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software and computer programs; design and development of computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; implementation of computer software and computer programs; information technology (IT) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); computerised analysis of data; customisation of computer software and computer programs; development of systems for the processing of data; calibration and configuration of computer software and computer programs; computer system integration services; research, development, design in relation to computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; testing of computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; analytical services relating to computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; IT technical consultancy; providing information, advice and consultancy in relation to computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; providing information, advice and consultancy relating to information systems and development and application of computer systems; hosting services and software as a service and rental of software; rental of computer hardware, computer software and computer programs; cloud computing; provision of security services for computer networks, computer access and computerised transactions; providing computer programmes via the internet (application service provider ASP) and services relating to computer programmes development; electronic storage of electronic media, namely, files, data, documents, text, videos, images, music, games and other multimedia | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |