USPTO serial 79237120
ARCLUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6160548Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2020
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ARCLUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
OPERA (Milano), IT
IT
IT
MILANO, IT
BESANA BRIANZA (Milano), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Mercanti
Michael N. Mercanti Lucas & Mercanti, LLP100 South Jefferson Road, Suite 202Whippany, NJ 07981United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, particularly lamps, chandeliers, screens for lamps in the nature of lampshades, light bulbs, sockets for electric lamps, Chinese lanterns for lighting; ventilation apparatus, particularly exhaust fans, all of the above goods sold exclusively as consumer goods for interior or outdoor permanent installation in a home or office | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Carmelo
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Carmelo
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Arianna
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Arianna
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Carmelo
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Carmelo
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Carmelo
- Other trademarks owned by DI SANO Biagio
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ARCLUCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |