USPTO serial 79237464
VENICEWINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENICEWINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Analcolic wines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine; wines; grappa; prosecco DOC; grape wines; sparkling (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); frizzy fruit wines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); wines with protected geographical indication; natural fermentation wine; sparkling wines; irrobusted wines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); fermi wines (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); sweet wines; rose wines; prosecco DOCG; aromatized wines; spicy wines; verduzzo (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); white pinot (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); chardonnay (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); manzoni (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); marzemino (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); raboso (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); black pinot (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); tai (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |