USPTO serial 79237725
DIAGNOSTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUROK, GALINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAGNOSTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
46395 Bocholt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie Anne Mastrovito
MARIE ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of couplings and gear boxes; cleaning, repair and maintenance of couplings and gear boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of training courses in the field of installation, operating, planning, cleaning, repair and maintenance of couplings and gear boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data analysis of technical data concerning speed, acceleration, torque, vibration, temperature, noise and pressure in industrial plants and of couplings and gear boxes for planning and operating couplings and gear boxes; Data analysis of technical data relating to overall drive train performance data in industrial plants for planning and operating couplings and gear boxes; Providing of hardware and software for compiling and analysing data for planning and operating commercial and industrial installations, in particular installation, operating, planning, cleaning, repair and maintenance of couplings and gear boxes; Cloud computing featuring software for use in operating couplings and gear boxes and technical consultancy in the field of operating couplings and gear boxes; engineering consultancy services, consulting services for digitalization of data, providing recommendations regarding the maintenance and updating of computer software, all in the field of optimizing the operation of couplings and gear boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |