USPTO serial 79237757
URIZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URIZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer chips in the nature of integrated circuits; Central processing units | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
- Other trademarks owned by Joint-Stock Company Research & Development Center "ELVEES"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named URIZEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |