Drawing for TEMI

USPTO serial 79237774

TEMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5688326Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 5, 2019
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TEMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy D. Gross

Roy D. Gross The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC101 Merritt 7, Suite 300Norwalk, CT 06854United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Robots with artificial intelligence, namely, robots for assisting humans with household chores and tasks; robots with artificial intelligence, namely, telepresence robots for use in business environment and private and public settings; robots with artificial intelligence, namely, robots with autonomous capabilities of navigating, path planning, obstacle avoidance and tracking for indoor and outdoor environments; robots with artificial intelligence, namely, robots for capturing, monitoring, controlling and transmitting a person's orientation, motion, temperature, heart function and muscle activity; robots with artificial intelligence, namely, robots capable of recognizing human speech and human gesture, and act according to the person's requestACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 2, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 12, 2019FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 5, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance