USPTO serial 79237829
MAXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5677361Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2019
- Examiner
- BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MAXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Nickerson
Michael J. Nickerson Dawson Law Firm, P.C.1844 Penfield RoadPenfield, NY 14526United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Joints predominantly made of metal, namely, joints for use within poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles; metal swivelling joints; couplings made predominantly of metal, namely, couplings for use within poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles; poles made of metal incorporating joints including swivelling joints; joints predominantly made of metal for raising and lowering poles such as light poles, cctv poles, and telecommunication poles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koekstone IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Swivelpole Patent Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MAXIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |