Drawing for STEMCIS

USPTO serial 79237945

STEMCIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STEMCIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical products excluding surgical implants comprising living tissue, namely, pharmaceutical products comprised of adipose tissue, adipose stem cells and progenitor cells for use in plastic and reconstructive surgery and human regenerative medicine; veterinary products excluding surgical implants comprising living tissue, namely, adipose tissue, adipose stem cells and progenitor cells; chemical preparations comprised of adipose tissue, adipose stem cells and progenitor cells for medical use and pharmaceutical useACTIVE—
010Surgical apparatus and instruments for collecting adipose tissue and purifying cells, excluding implants; medical apparatus and instruments for collecting adipose tissue and purifying cells, excluding implants; veterinary apparatus and instruments for collecting adipose tissue and purifying cells, excluding implantsACTIVE—
044Medical services relating to therapeutic solutions in the fields of plastic and reconstructive surgery and human regenerative medicine, using adipose tissue and progenitor cells, excluding implants; medical consultation; plastic surgery relating to therapeutic solutions by using adipose tissue and progenitor cells, excluding implants; hospital services relating to therapeutic solutions by using adipose tissue and progenitor cells, excluding implants; alternative medicine servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 15, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance