USPTO serial 79238182
NINETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NINETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pedometers; smartphones; time recording apparatus; batteries, electric; chargers for electric batteries; computer programs [downloadable software]; materials for electricity mains [wires, cables]; navigational instruments; theft prevention installations, electric; headphones | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Handbags; pocket wallets; rucksacks; leather laces; travelling bags; trunks [luggage]; umbrellas; bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Hosiery; girdles; ready-made clothing; hats; clothing; footwear; children's clothing; layettes [clothing]; scarfs; neckties | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Bill-posting; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; demonstration of goods; advertising; on-line advertising on a computer network; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; commercial information and advice for consumers [consumer advice shop] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research; updating of computer software; computer software design; rental of computer software; computer programming; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; providing search engines for the internet; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; industrial design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shanghai Runmi Technology Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NINETY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |