Drawing for JOT AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 79238219

JOT AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5969644Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 28, 2020
Examiner
RADCLIFF, BRENT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with JOT AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yuval H. Marcus

Yuval H. Marcus Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Ave., Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Servo axis in the nature of industrial robots and palletising devices in the nature of loading and unloading machines, featuring material tray feeders, tray loaders and unloaders for assembly materials in production lines or materials movement in production environmentACTIVE—
009Electrical signal testing machines, RF signal testing machines, optical and audio testing machines, testing machines in the nature of touch and force actuating and measurement devices and circuit boards in the nature of circuit board handling machines for industrial purposes; downloadable production and testing machines control and analysis software for automatic production systemsACTIVE—
037Maintenance, repair and installation services of servo axis robots and industrial robots and palletizing devices for transport; maintenance, repair and installation services for testing machines and circuit board handling machines for industrial purposes; installation and maintenance of automatic production equipment for othersACTIVE—
042Planning of complete production automation system projects in the nature of planning of electronics manufacturing system covering whole supply chain, namely, designing automated production linesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 6, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 22, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance