Drawing for JETLITE

USPTO serial 79238239

JETLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JETLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Mlotkowski

Michael J. Mlotkowski Insigne LLP44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 305Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the field aviation, namely, software for operating a passenger-specific holistic jetlag mitigation system; computer software for use in the field aviation, namely, software for operating a passenger-specific holistic jetlag mitigation system including adjustable lighting features; computer software for use in connection with jetlag mitigation systems including data processing of biorhythms and nutritional needs; electronic downloadable publications in the nature of downloadable instructional manual for operating jetlag mitigation systems; downloadable software for operating passenger-specific holistic jetlag mitigation system operable by smartphones, tablets, personal computers, electronic book readers and computer hardwareACTIVE—
042Engineering consultancy services; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware; telecommunications technology consulting for the aviation industry; technical research in the field of jetlag mitigation systems and effects of passenger-specific biorhythms and nutrition associated with jetlag; technical research in the field of jetlag mitigation systems and effects of lighting using passenger specific biorhythms and nutrition associated with jetlag; technical research in the field of aeronautics; technical consultancy in the field of aerospace engineering; technological consultancy in the field of aerospace engineering; interior design services for aviation jetlag mitigation systems; software design and development; design, development and implementation of software; computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; rental of software; maintenance, repair and updating of computer software; all the foregoing services provided in the field of aviation and aeronautics controls for designing, developing, customizing, and implementation of aviation jetlag mitigation systemsACTIVE—
043Consultancy services in the field of food and drink cateringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance