USPTO serial 79238321
CONGRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONGRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic data processing equipment and computers, in particular data input and output apparatus, expansion cards for data processing equipment, memories, input and output interface apparatus and programs, data carriers and programs recorded thereon, data processing programs, programs in the form of tools for facilitating the development of software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hardware and software development services; creation of calibration software for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |