Drawing for DEVIL CRASHER

USPTO serial 79238623

DEVIL CRASHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5790554Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 2, 2019
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEVIL CRASHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yan Song

Yan Song AEON Law, PLLC1718 E. Olive WaySeattle, WA 98102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer game software; downloadable image files containing pictures from a boxing game; downloadable animation files; downloadable computer game software; downloadable mobile game software; downloadable animated cartoon files; videotapes and video disks recorded with animation; downloadable game programs provided online from a computer network or mobile phone network; computer game softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Providing amusement arcade services; provision of information relating to games; electronic games services provided by means of a global communication network; mobile game services, namely, providing non-downloadable video games presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; planning, operating, arranging of online game competitions; providing news and information in the field of electronic games via online networks; electronic games services provided by means of the internet; information relating to computer gaming entertainment provided on-line from a computer database or a global communication networkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 2, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 25, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 2, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 8, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance