USPTO serial 79238660
AIKIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5736454Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIKIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Burger
Thomas J. Burger Wood, Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnai, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for monitoring, operating and controlling self-driving and autonomous vehicles; computer software and hardware for training, verification, development and maintenance of hardware and software solutions for self-driving and autonomous vehicles; computer software and hardware for driving simulators, and for semi-supervised annotation and camera image-based labelling tools; computer software and hardware for calibrating self-driving and autonomous vehicles also in relation to surround view and to correct self-localization, including collecting data from multiple cameras and sensors of vehicles; computer software and hardware for collecting data for testing and situation analysis, and for supplying the data for deep learning for self-driving functionalities; computer software and hardware for training, verification, development and maintenance of self-driving and autonomous vehicle functionalities, namely, of artificial intelligence, deep learning, computer vision, image analysis, image recognition, autonomous vehicle monitoring and control, driver-assisted vehicle monitoring and control, vehicle subsystem monitoring and control, decision- making for vehicle control, adapting to different driving cultures and situation-specific driving styles, human-machine interfaces for vehicles, object detection, lane detection, semantic segmentation for vehicle control, multi-object tracking, tracking and predicting motion patterns of surrounding objects, recognizing emergency situations, navigation and self-localization, facial analysis, and image recognition | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |