Drawing for CYTOGRAPHER

USPTO serial 79238714

CYTOGRAPHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5724397Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 16, 2019
Examiner
YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CYTOGRAPHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Mehok

Michelle L. Mehok Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP11682 El Camino Real, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Software for searching, retrieving, storing, maintaining and managing data in the field of biotechnology; software for use in biological modeling, analysis and information management; software for use in drug and biomarker discovery; software for biomolecules analysis; software for evaluating biological specimens; software for accessing, collecting, detecting, comparing, calculating, analyzing, displaying, transmitting, managing and storing immune profiling data; software for use in performing lab services, describing the status of disease progression, prioritization of treatment strategies; software for use in data collection, review, interpretation, comparison, and analysis of T cells and/or other immune cells features ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Biotechnology research; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for searching, retrieving, storing, maintaining and managing data in the field of biotechnology; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in biological modeling, analysis and information management; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in drug and biomarker discovery; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for biomolecules analysis; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for evaluating biological specimens; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for accessing, collecting, detecting, comparing, calculating, analyzing, displaying, transmitting, managing and storing immune profiling data; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in performing lab services, describing the status of disease progression, prioritization of treatment strategies; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in data collection, review, interpretation, comparison, and analysis of T cells and/or other immune cells featuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 6, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 22, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 22, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 202571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 18, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance