USPTO serial 79238769
ECOBRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5876243Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2019
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOBRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FR
FR
FR
GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia L. Carron
Virginia L. Carron Finnegan901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals used in industry, minerals used in industry, namely, blends of alkaline earth metal oxides or alkaline earth metal hydroxides optionally also containing talc, bentonite, zeolite, diatomaceous earth, mica, hydrophobic carbonates, enzymes for industrial use, cationic polymers, aluminium sulphate, polyaluminium chloride and dispersing agents; ] chemicals used in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products; and minerals used in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products, namely, blends of alkaline earth metal oxides or alkaline earth metal hydroxides optionally also containing talc, bentonite, zeolite, diatomaceous earth, mica, hydrophobic carbonates, enzymes for industrial use, cationic polymers, aluminium sulphate, polyaluminium chloride and dispersing agents; [ magnesium hydroxide; magnesium hydroxide for industrial use; ] magnesium hydroxide used in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products; talc used as an additive in manufacture of paper and cardboard products to improve productivity, surface and print quality; talc used in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products; bleaching preparations for industrial purposes * for use in the bleaching of cellulose fibre based chemical and mechanical pulp * ; chemical compounds used in pulp bleaching * in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products * including magnesium hydroxide and talc; chemicals used in pulp bleaching * in the manufacture of paper and cardboard products *, including [ tab ] * talc *, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium sulphate, caustic soda, silicate and hydrogen peroxide | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment and processing of minerals; information relating to the treatment and processing of minerals, handling of minerals being the extraction, production and processing of minerals for use in industry, enrichment, refining and processing of minerals; chemical treatment of minerals, washing and drying of minerals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imerys Talc Europe
- Other trademarks owned by Imerys Talc Europe
- Other trademarks owned by Imerys Talc Europe
- Other trademarks owned by Artemyn UK Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Berg Minerals UK Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ECOBRIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 30, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |