USPTO serial 79238918
LA ESTANCIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA ESTANCIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Ortiz-Ponce
VIVIAN ORTIZ-PONCE MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSP O BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit beverages, fruit juices, vegetable juices, energy drinks, beverages containing fruit juices, beverages flavored with tea, carbonated non-alcoholic drinks, soft drinks, isotonic beverages, smoothies; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Syrups and other preparations for making beverages in the nature of syrups for beverages containing fruit juices, syrups for beverages flavored with tea, syrups for carbonated non-alcoholic drinks, syrups for soft drinks, syrups for isotonic beverages, syrups for energy drinks, syrups for smoothies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |