Drawing for AMCC ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING COMPETENCE CENTER

USPTO serial 79239528

AMCC ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING COMPETENCE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5893652Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 29, 2019
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AMCC ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING COMPETENCE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consultancy services regarding business strategy; business consultancy and advisory services; business consultancy in the field of additive manufacturing and surface finishing, namely, consumer information and advice to consumers regarding the selection of products and items to be purchased, business feasibility studies, consumer information advisory services relating to the purchase of goods on behalf of others, providing business information in the field of technology and know-how transfer and selection of suitable technology, providing business information in the field of project feasibility analysis, customer assistance in purchasing additive manufacturing plants in the nature of purchasing agentsACTIVE—
042Technical business consultancy in the field of additive manufacturing and surface finishing, namely, in the field of engineering feasibility studies, design feasibility studies, feasibility studies relating to material analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 29, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 24, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2018CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 26, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance