USPTO serial 79239820
MULTIAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5809228Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2019
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MULTIAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC4300 Fordham Road, NW, Suite 250Washington, DC 20016-1950United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Blowing machines and fans for the compression, sucking and carrying of grain; grain cleaners, namely machines for cleaning grains; mechanical conveyor belts for grain and crops; machines for processing grain; grain-dryers; straw drying machinery; blowing machines for the compression, aspiration and transport of grain; grain elevators; machines for the transport of industrial waste, including granules, paper and plastic; machines for handling industrial waste, including granules, paper and plastic; machines for sorting industrial waste, including granules, paper and plastic; chemical cleaning machines; cyclones; filtering machines; separator machines; sorters, namely, sorting machines for sorting grains and industrial waste, namely, papaer and plastic waste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |