USPTO serial 79239829
BASS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | data processing equipment; apparatus and instruments, all for recording, producing, transmitting, editing or processing video signals; power supplies; recording discs; electric apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images; home cinema processors; high fidelity video equipment; magnetic data carriers; cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of equalizers, of power supplies, of cables; retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of home cinema processors; retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of electric apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images, of accessories, parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, all for recording, producing, transmitting, editing or processing video signals, of audio processing apparatus; retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of magnetic data carriers, of recording discs, of data processing equipment, all for recording, producing, transmitting, editing or processing video signals, of audio processing apparatus; retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of video receivers; retail services and business mediation and consultancy regarding the sale through internet (so called e-commerce activities) of high fidelity video equipment; distribution of advertising matter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |