USPTO serial 79240026
INTROSPECTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTROSPECTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advisory services relating to data processing; business consultancy services relating to data processing; business data analysis services; collection of data; commercial information services provided by access to a computer database; company data information services (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); compilation of business data; compilation of information into computer databases; compilation or exploitation of mathematical data; computer data processing; computerised data processing; computerised data verification; computerised database management; consultancy relating to data processing; data analysis (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); data base management; data base services for business; data capture (keyboarding) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); data collection (for others) (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); data compilation for others; data handling (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); data management; data management advice; data management consultancy; data processing; data processing for businesses; data processing for the collection of data for business purposes; data processing verification; data search in computer files (for others); data verification; database management; electronic data processing; interpretation of market research data; maintaining data in databases; online data processing services; provision of business data; systemization of information into computer databases; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; updating data in databases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |