USPTO serial 79240066
AIRWASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5836809Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2019
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AIRWASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC4300 Fordham Road, NW, Suite 250Washington, DC 20016-1950United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Blowing machines or fans for the compression, sucking and carrying of grain; grain cleaners, namely, grain cleaning machines; mechanical conveyor belts for grain and crops; machines for processing grain, namely, grain separating machines; grain-dryers , namely, grain drying machines; straw drying machinery; blowing machines for the compression, aspiration and transport of grain; grain elevators; machines for the transport of industrial waste, including granules, paper and plastic; machines for sorting industrial waste, including granules, paper and plastic; chemical cleaning machines; cyclones; filtering machines for chemical processing; grain separator machines; sorters, namely, sorting machines for chemical processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |