Drawing for WINFACTORY

USPTO serial 79240373

WINFACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5934554Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2019
Examiner
TULLY, MATTHEW
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with WINFACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter S. Sloane

Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Avenue, Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded and downloadable computer software for industrial process control; industrial computer software for monitoring and controlling industrial processes; industrial computer software for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) for process control and gathering data to control equipment and conditions; computer application software for use in database management; industrial process control softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 17, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 18, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance