USPTO serial 79240587
AMBIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMBIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
THEODORE R REMAKLUS WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STREETCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Commercial business management services, namely, assisting others in the use of artificial intelligence in the management and exchange of secure and private communications and electronic data collaboration; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, telecommunications access services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, conducting classes in the field of computer software information technology; training services in the field of information technology; entertainment services in the nature of professional athletes competing in track and field events; sporting and cultural activities, namely, providing in-person cultural and sporting forum in the field of ballet and track and field events | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and industrial research services; design and development of artificial intelligence software for use in secure and private communications and electronic data collaboration | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Legal services; security services for the protection of property and individuals, namely the protection of individuals' personal data | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aztrana AG
- Other trademarks owned by Aztrana AG
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named AMBIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |