USPTO serial 79240591
Serial No. 79240591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5893665Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2019
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79240591?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried meat slice; dried meat floss; meat paste; dried fish; marinated egg; milk-based milk tea; soybean milk extractive; fruit jellies; nuts, prepared; peanuts, processed | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Soluble coffee; tea; flowers or leaves for use as tea substitutes; tea-based beverages; confectionery, namely, fondants; mooncake; peanut confectionery, namely, peanut candy; biscuits; pastries; cereal preparations, namely, cereal bars | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |