USPTO serial 79240592
SLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6026035Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2020
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1266 Duillier, CH
CH-1266 Duillier, CH
CH-1266 Duillier, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynde Herzbach
MICHAEL T SMITH BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP8110 GATEHOUSE ROADSUITE 100 EASTFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for processing materials, namely, ceramic, ceramic composite, diamond, polycrystalline diamond, gemstone, carbide metal, semi-conductor material, by means of laser and water jet; Machines for processing, by ablating, materials, namely, ceramic, diamond, polycrystalline diamond, gemstone, carbide metal, semi-conductor material, by means of laser and water jet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Software for controlling lasers for processing materials, namely, ceramic, ceramic composite, diamond, polycrystalline diamond, gemstone, carbide metal, semi-conductor material, excluding software for the manufacture of dental products or for dental treatment in humans; Software for controlling lasers for ablating materials, namely, ceramic, diamond, polycrystalline diamond, gemstone, carbide metal, semi-conductor material, by means of laser and water jet excluding software for the manufacture of dental products or for dental treatment in humans; lasers for non-medical use excluding lasers for the manufacture of dental products or for dental treatment in humans | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical use excluding lasers for the manufacture of dental products or for dental treatment in humans | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials for third parties, namely, ceramic, ceramic composite, diamond, polycrystalline diamond, gemstone, carbide metal, semiconductor material, by laser and waterjet, excluding treatment of materials for the manufacture of dental products or for dental treatment in humans | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SYNOVA SA
- Other trademarks owned by SYNOVA SA
- Other trademarks owned by SYNOVA SA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |