USPTO serial 79241025
GMT LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, CAILE MAUREEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GMT LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches and other horological and chronometric instruments; straps for watches, bracelets for watches and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |