USPTO serial 79241438
AI AIDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5736536Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AI AIDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Drive assist and safety devices and systems, namely, forward collision warning systems, autonomous emergency brakes, backward collision warning systems, lane departure warning systems, lane keep assist systems, blind spot detection systems; parking assist devices and systems, namely, smart parking assist sensor systems, forward-backward parking sensors; advanced driving visibility devices and systems in the nature of sensors; computer software and hardware for operating self-driving and autonomous vehicles; computer software and hardware for use with self-driving and autonomous vehicles; computer software enabling self-driving functionalities using neural networks; computer software and hardware for self-driving and autonomous vehicles, namely, for artificial intelligence, deep learning, computer vision, image analysis, image recognition, autonomous vehicle monitoring and control, driver-assisted vehicle monitoring and control, vehicle subsystem monitoring and control, decision-making for vehicle control, adapting to different driving cultures and situation-specific driving styles, human-machine interfaces for vehicles, object detection, lane detection, semantic segmentation for vehicle control, multi-object tracking, tracking and predicting motion patterns of surrounding objects, recognizing emergency situations, navigation and self-localization, facial analysis, and image recognition; artificial intelligence apparatus, instruments and software applicable to self-driving and autonomous vehicles, namely, sensors and software for controlling self-driving and autonomous vehicles; apparatus for the processing of images; navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices and systems for operating self-driving and autonomous vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 26, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |