USPTO serial 79241889
I- BIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I- BIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J Grahn
BARBARA J GRAHN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP222 SOUTH NINTH ST SUITE 2000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for image processing, namely, computer software for improving digital images and photographs in mobile devices and cameras, computer software for use with mobile devices and cameras for automatically capturing photographic images and videos when detecting motion by the subject matter, computer software for improving the quality of photography in cameras and mobile devices, computer software for enhancing focus and depth of camera field control in cameras and mobile devices; computers; computer peripherals; smartphones, tablet computers, computer cameras, drone cameras, surveillance cameras, 360-degree cameras and action cameras, and structural components for tablet computers, smart phones, computer cameras, drone cameras, surveillance cameras, 360 degree cameras and action cameras; telecommunication machines and apparatus, and their parts, namely, camera modules with communication functions for use in smart phones and communication boards with camera functions for use in computers; photographic apparatus and instruments, and their parts, namely, cameras and digital cameras | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing online, non-downloadable software for image processing, namely, computer software for improving digital images and photographs in mobile devices and cameras, online, nondownloadable computer software for use with mobile devices and cameras for automatically capturing photographic images and videos when detecting motion by the subject matter, online, nondownloadable computer software for improving the quality of photography in cameras and mobile devices, online, nondownloadable computer software for enhancing focus and depth of camera field control in cameras and mobile devices; Software as a service (saas) featuring software for processing digital images, namely, online, non-downloadable computer software for improving digital images and photographs in mobile devices and cameras, online, nondownloadable computer software for use with mobile devices and cameras for automatically capturing photographic images and videos when detecting motion by the subject matter, online, nondownloadable computer software for improving the quality of photography in cameras and mobile devices, online, nondownloadable computer software for enhancing focus and depth of camera field control in cameras and mobile devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |