USPTO serial 79241939
DRYLYTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5706410Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2019
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DRYLYTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
Scott J. Major Millen White Zelano & Branigan, PC2200 Clarendon Blvd., 14th FloorArlington, VA 22201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Liquids for metalworking excluding cutting fluids, namely, quenching fluids for use in metalworking; liquids for polishing metals, namely, chemical slurries for polishing metals | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Metalworking machines, namely, boring machines for metalworking, broaching machines for metalworking, bending machines for metalworking, cutting machines for metalworking, drilling machines for metalworking; grinding machines for metalworking, milling machines for metalworking, perforating machines for metalworking, horning machines for metalworking, lapping machines for metalworking, planing machines for metalworking, shaping machines for metalworking, shearing machines for metalworking, slotting machines for metalworking, honing machines for metalworking; polishing machines for metalworking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |