USPTO serial 79242199
C COSMO NAUTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C COSMO NAUTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Hosting of databases; hosting platforms on the Internet; hosting computer sites [websites]; rental of database management software; analysis and evaluation of product development; electronic data storage for others; design of web portals; design, development and programming of computer software; project management; design and development of systems for data input, output, processing, display and storage; design and development of data processing systems; design and development of computer software for process control; design and development of energy management software; consultancy in the field of computer system analysis; consultancy relating to the design and development of computer-hardware and computer-software architecture; design consultancy and developing computer software; design consultancy, programming or maintaining of computer software; consultancy in the hardware sector, software; programming; consultancy in the field of computer system integration; consultancy relating to software maintenance; computer software consultancy; consultancy in the field of security software; technological consultancy; consultancy in the field of energy-saving; creating and maintaining websites for cellular phones; computer software design; providing information relating to computer software design; providing information relating to computer-software development; providing information relating to computer-software development; providing information relating to design and development of computer hardware and software; providing computer programs according to the specifications of others; conducting technical project studies; information technology project management; research and development of computer programs and software; research relating to the development of computer software; advice and consultancy relating to computer software; advice and development of software; software engineering services for data processing programs; engineering services in the field of environmental technology; software as a service [Saas] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |