USPTO serial 79242208
SELECTIV'PROCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5796567Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2019
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SELECTIV'PROCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-84120 PERTUIS, FR
PERTUIS, FR
F-84120 PERTUIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Swartz
Michael F. Swartz Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines and large agricultural implements, namely, [ incorporators, coulters, cultipackers and tilling machines for agricultural use; cutting, pre-cutting, topping, pruning, windrowing, ] picking and harvesting machines, grape harvesting machines, sorting machines for use in agriculture, industry, [ waste sorting; machines for tying and attaching vines and plants; ] destemming machines; [ power-operated basket presses; leaf-stripping machines; multi-functional racks being parts of machines for agriculture; multi-functional tool holders being parts of machines for load-bearing vehicles being tractors; vibrators for harvesting small fruit; ] machine tools for [ cutting, pre-cutting, topping, pruning, windrowing, ] picking and harvesting for use in agriculture; [ motors and engines being other than for land vehicles; robots being machines, namely, industrial robots; devices for guiding machines, namely, cutting guides for power tools; machines for soil cultivation; machines for spraying fertilizer and treatment products for agriculture; agricultural implements other than hand-operated ones, namely, power-operated cultivators; diggers being machines, namely, power-operated chain-type trenching machines for digging trenches; threshers, combined reapers- threshers, reapers, combined reapers-binders; bulldozers; bulldozers; grinding machines for agricultural use; garbage being waste disposals; centrifuges; electric shears; chisels for machines; waste compacting machines; compressors for machines, road rollers; crushing machines, namely, stem crushing machines; root slicers being machines; cutters being parts of machines; peeling machines, namely, food peeling machines for commercial use; harvesting machines, namely, combine harvesters; knives for mowing machines; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated, namely, power driven saws, chain saws; saws being parts of machines, chain saws; machines for extracting oils; juice and oil extraction machines for centrifuging; ] spare and replacement parts for the above goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |