USPTO serial 79242681
COCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger, Esq.
Jeffrey H. Greger, Esq. Roberts Mlotkowski Safran Cole & Caldero7918 Jones Branch DriveSuite 500McLean, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, frozen, dried, and cooked fruit and vegetables; fruit snacks; candied fruit; nuts; blanched nuts; shelled nuts; candied nuts; spiced nuts; dried nuts; ground nuts; nuts, prepared; seasoned nuts; edible nuts; salted nuts; processed nuts; preserved nuts; flavoured nuts; roasted nuts; crystallised fruit; fruit peel; nut toppings; jellies, jams, and compotes; milk and dairy products; milk beverages; milk shakes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice; baked goods; biscuits; chocolate; chocolate based products; pralines; sweets; marzipan; cereal-based snack food; mousse desserts; custard; chocolate topping; chocolate coating; chocolate extracts; chocolate fondue; chocolate shells; chocolate confectionery; chocolate coffee; chocolate eggs; chocolate sweets; dairy chocolate; milk chocolate; chocolate powder; truffles (confectionery); filled chocolates; toffee; fudge; chocolate-coated nuts; chocolate coated dried fruit; prepared desserts; confectionery; coated nuts (confectionery); non-medicated confectionery; confectionery in the form of tablets; coffee beans; roasted coffee beans; chocolate coated coffee beans; chocolate drink preparations; drinking chocolate; chocolate beverages; hot chocolate; coffee oils; food flavourings, other than essential oils; essences for food (other than essential oils); extracts used as flavouring (not essential oils); herbal flavourings, other than essential oils, for making beverages; ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |