USPTO serial 79242908
PICOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PICOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, downloadable software on the Internet, application software for smart phones, application software for mobile phones, computer software applications, downloadable computer software applications, applications for mobile devices, downloadable applications for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising, retail sale of computer software, computer software applications, applications for mobile devices, application software for smart phones, application software for mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, online game services, game services provided on-line from a computer network or a mobile phone network, providing game services provided on-line from a computer network or a mobile phone network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of software, design, development and implementation of software, rental, installation, maintenance and updating of software, design and development of computer software applications, rental, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software applications, design and development of applications for mobile devices, rental, installation, maintenance and updating of applications for mobile devices, design and development of application software for smart phones, rental, installation, maintenance and updating of application software for smart phones, design and development of application software for mobile phones, rental, installation, maintenance and updating of application software for mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |