USPTO serial 79242955
NOMNOM MONSTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOMNOM MONSTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable image files containing artwork, text, audio, video, games and Internet Web links relating to computer gaming; tablet computers; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of ebooks, newsletters, pamphlets, and articles in the field of computer games; television apparatus for projection purposes; computer game programs; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; portable media players; computer gaming software (recorded) for recreational game playing purposes; Internet communication equipment, namely, network routers and LAN (local area network) access points for connecting network computer users; video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organization of education or entertainment competitions in the field of computer games; providing online non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of ebooks, newsletters, pamphlets, and articles in the field of computer games; providing on-line videos featuring computer games, not downloadable; film production; providing sports facilities; educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of computer games; game equipment rental; game services provided on-line from a computer network; television entertainment, namely, ongoing television programs in the field of variety; entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |