USPTO serial 79243091
COX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, SHANNON B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Industrial oils and greases; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels; illuminants; non-chemical additives for oils and fuels; lubricants and lubricating greases; lubricating products for use in metal working; engine oils, gear oils, automotive final drive oils; waxes; petroleum jelly for industrial purposes; cutting and grinding fuels and oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Engines; compressors; air condensers; condensing installations; generators; filters; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, sea and air; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of engines; anti-rust treatment for vehicles, aircrafts, land vehicles; installation, maintenance, repair and servicing of vehicles; machinery installation, maintenance and repair; information and advisory services for the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of engines; design and development of vehicles; professional advisory services relating to design and development of new products, namely, engines and machinery and vehicles; technological consultancy and advice, surveying, technical and scientific research and design services all relating to industry, engineering, vehicles, engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cox Powertrain Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |